Is Vaping Health Risky?
The writer examines the possible social and health benefits of adolescent smoking, while also considering potential harm. She identifies e-cigarettes as electric cigarettes but calls them a tobacco product. The authors explore the various options available for teens in light of the fact that smoking has become a socially unacceptable behavior. She argues that people should think about the social norms that promote smoking to teens, while also Puff Bar taking into consideration the dangers of nicotine addiction. The author also examines the difference between teenage smoking and adult smoking. After reviewing the literature, I trust her that e-cigarette vaporizers are a harmless option to smoking, if used correctly.
Almost all of the data on smoking and its own risks comes from adults, which makes it hard to assess the way the risks are reduced by e-smoking. It is estimated that approximately fourteen thousand deaths every year are due to smoking. This figure is likely an underestimation, because so many deaths may be the consequence of second hand smoke. In addition, it assumes that people who smoke don’t intend to achieve this.
The author suggests that we should think about the fact that e-cigarettes mimic the result of tobacco products, while providing a far less harmful experience. The problem with this particular approach is that it treats all smoking as dangerous, even though it isn’t. Many people don’t understand how similar the taste of a cigarette to a vaporizer, or how similar the physical act of smoking is to smoking. Furthermore, it presumes that people who use the cigarettes aren’t taking any real risks. The argument that comes from this is that because e smokers don’t feel the physical effects of smoking, they can not be deemed to be causing these deaths, if they are.
However, it is critical to remember that smoking and using vaporizers are both virtually identical behaviors. What makes vaporizing unique is that it allows a smoker to achieve the same effect as smoking cigarettes, without the associated risks. Vaporizing offers a highly similar experience as smoking cigarettes. This means that vapers could be increasing their likelihood of quitting the habit. In addition, it means that they’re taking steps in direction of protecting their health while simultaneously increasing the chance of enjoying a wholesome lifestyle.
The writer makes some valid points concerning the dangers of smoking cigarettes. He also makes some valid criticisms of having less nicotine, and of the dangers of carbon monoxide smoke. However, his real issue is one of regulation. He argues that e-cigarette companies shouldn’t be allowed to advertise their products as safe when all they will have done is increase the quantity of chemicals and additives that are present in traditional cigarettes. The issue with this argument is that we have already seen the negative effects of increased levels of these chemicals in traditional cigarettes.
We already have countless reports about the negative unwanted effects of nicotine, especially in smokers trying to quit. We already have plenty of stories about the rise of cancers and respiratory problems due to long-term nicotine use. It’s true that e-cigs don’t contain any nicotine, but that hasn’t stopped them from being advertised as a cure-all for smoking. E Cigarettes have certainly been an important factor in the spike in smoking-related deaths in the last couple of years.
The author does not may actually recognize the irony of arguing against smoking through a healthier alternative, but doesn’t appear to consider the potential negative health ramifications of his product either. He also discounts the theory that smokers who switch to the cigarettes will eventually turn back to cigarette smoking. He appears to think that all we have to do to beat cigarettes would be to reduce the quantity of nicotine we take in. The truth is that smokers who make an effort to quit often do so because of other health issues, and aren’t just embracing the cigarettes to get from their bad habits. There are lots of reasons why people smoke. The writer has basically ignored all of them in his arguments against vaping.
While it is true that the cigarettes do not contain any real tobacco, a number of the chemicals found in using tobacco are located in the smokes. The author seems to be of the fact that all we need to do to solve the issue of smoking is to decrease the amount of chemicals we take in through our lungs. The argument he presents is merely not based in sound scientific fact. There is absolutely no real proof that reducing the amount of chemicals we take in improves anything other than our health and wellness. The author also discounts the idea that the cigarettes are less hazardous than regular cigarettes because they don’t contain any of the harmful chemicals found in regular cigarettes.